Why Innovation promises to be a consistent tailwind for Healthcare sector leaders


January 14, 2022


January 14, 2022


January 14, 2022

As the MRNA winners of the COVID-19 vaccine race turn their sights to illnesses like shingles and the flu, investors and analysts are renewing their focus on innovation in the healthcare sector. If a technology like MRNA can conquer endemic illness and even go on to combat cancer, what other lifechanging innovations could the healthcare sector provide us with? What opportunities could those innovations open for investors?

For Paul MacDonald, CIO of Harvest Portfolios Group, the healthcare innovation story is wider, deeper, and richer than MRNA. MacDonald explained that the healthcare sector has been innovating since human beings first started to treat illness. It is a sector built on the use of the scientific method to develop novel solutions to new and ancient problems of human health. Healthcare companies, by nature, push the limits of human knowledge to heal people. That means innovation in the space is a near-constant.

In the healthcare sector, MacDonald explained, large-cap companies play an outsized role. These firms have the scale to innovate a wide range of products and services on their own and are well positioned to capture value from innovations initiated by smaller-scale companies. The view that these large-caps serve as the fulcrum of healthcare innovation underpins the Harvest Healthcare Leaders Income ETF (HHL).

“When we think about large-cap healthcare, we have to see these companies as innovators,” MacDonald said. “They are always innovating on their own, but they’re also the companies that have the ability to extract value from innovation by smaller-cap firms in the sector.

“Within HHL, we own the dominant companies in the sector, companies with tremendous R&D platforms across subsectors.”

How one ETF captures a universe of healthcare innovation

Those subsectors include pharmaceutical companies finding new avenues for MRNA, but they also include the biotech companies like Abbot Labs using phones to better monitor diabetes patients and the med-tech companies like Stryker developing robotic surgery assistants to power less-invasive operations with better outcomes. It even includes healthcare providers like United Health, using and developing new technologies to provide better and more efficient patient care. HHL is set up, through a basket of 20 of the best large-cap healthcare companies, to capture healthcare innovation in almost all its forms.

That diversity of innovation, MacDonald said, is why a large-cap ETF like HHL is so well positioned in the space. He explained that healthcare innovation will generally follow one of two paths. The first is that headline-grabbing, game-changing, blockbuster innovation. That would happen when one company is able to completely change the outcomes for an illness or condition that hasn’t seen much significant improvement. A major leap in Alzheimer’s treatment, MacDonald said, would be one such blockbuster.

The second, far more common path of innovation comes in smaller steps as companies build on the progress others have made. Companies might apply the technology behind an anti-inflammatory drug designed to treat dermatitis being to create a better asthma drug or they might continue to push the remarkable progress already made in using immunotherapy to treat cancers. Many of these innovations won’t grab headlines, but they will change lives and create huge opportunities for growth.

MacDonald explained that he and his portfolio management team can track that growth through statistics on patients using particular drugs or signing up for specific elective surgeries. He can see the demand profile for new innovations, be they blockbusters or steady growers, and track how the positive impacts of these innovations flow from and to the large-cap firms in HHL.

Capturing innovation-driven growth while mitigating innovation-related risk

Innovation can be a double-edged sword. While the growth it drives is remarkable, companies that are overexposed to their R&D pipelines or a single innovation track can be particularly exposed to risk. MacDonald explained that HHL’s investment strategy is designed to capture the near-constant innovation in the healthcare sector while using diversification and a focus on the best companies in the sector to mitigate risk.

Harvest’s approach, across most of their ETFs, begins with a funnel that takes an investable universe like healthcare and narrows it to a group of roughly 85 large-cap companies. Of these top performers, Harvest’s portfolio managers select about 20 stocks to comprise their ETF through a diversification lens that offers broad exposure to innovation and growth while avoiding over-exposure to any particular subsector.

“We’ll miss some of the rockets,” MacDonald said, “but we’ll avoid some of the torpedoes.”

One of those torpedoes is Moderna. While the company may have done well in recent months, and been a significant story through the past two years, MacDonald highlighted the fact that in his eyes, Moderna is singularly exposed to MRNA and its stock has recently taken a beating accordingly. He would rather own a firm like Pfizer which has a deep R&D pipeline covering a range of drugs and medications while partnering with an MRNA innovator in BioNTech.

The result is a basket of companies well-positioned to capitalize on the healthcare sector’s near-constant innovation while offering diversification and stability to counteract any potential innovation-related volatility.

“These are companies that are innovating, which comes with a risk-return association,” MacDonald said, “But given the scale that they have, they can buy assets, de-risk, and continue to extract a significant amount of value from the constant innovation in this space.”

By Paul MacDonald, CFA

Chief Investment Officer
Harvest Portfolios Group


For Information Purposes Only. All comments, opinions and views expressed are of a general nature and should not be considered as advice and/or a recommendation to purchase or sell the mentioned securities or used to engage in personal investment strategies.

You will usually pay brokerage fees to your dealer if you purchase or sell units of the Fund(s) on the TSX. If the units are purchased or sold on the TSX, investors may pay more than the current net asset value when buying units of the Fund(s) and may receive less than the current net asset value when selling them. There are ongoing fees and expenses associated with owning units of an investment fund. Investment funds are not guaranteed, their values change frequently and past performance may not be repeated. An investment fund must prepare disclosure documents that contain key information about the fund. You can find more detailed information about the fund in these documents.

Certain statements in the Harvest Blog are forward looking Forward-looking statements (“FLS”) are statements that are predictive in nature, depend upon or refer to future events or conditions, or that include words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” or “estimate,” or other similar expressions. Statements that look forward in time or include anything other than historical information are subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results, actions or events could differ materially from those set forth in the FLS.

FLS are not guarantees of future performance and are by their nature based on numerous assumptions, which include, amongst other things, that (i) the Fund can attract and maintain investors and have sufficient capital under management to effect their investment strategies, (ii) the investment strategies will produce the results intended by the portfolio managers, and (iii) the markets will react and perform in a manner consistent with the investment strategies. Although the FLS contained herein are based upon what the portfolio manager believe to be reasonable assumptions, the portfolio manager cannot assure that actual results will be consistent with these FLS.

Unless required by applicable law, Harvest Portfolios Group Inc. does not undertake, and specifically disclaim, any intention or obligation to update or revise any FLS, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.